![]()
2025 Chevrolet
|
![]()
2025 Mazda
|
|
MPG - City | Info not available | 23 - 24 MPG |
MPG - Hwy | Info not available | Info not available |
Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 6 - 8 seats |
Cargo Space | 59.1 ft3 | 74.2 - 75.2 ft3 |
Engine |
|
|
Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive, Front Wheel Drive, Rear Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
Horsepower | 220 - 615 hp | 280 - 340 hp |
Towing Capacity | Info not available | 3,500 - 5,000 lbs |
Exterior Length | 192.2 - 192.7 in | 201.6 in |
Exterior Width | 78.0 in | 77.6 in |
Leg Room |
Front 44.2 in
Rear 38.9 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.4 in |
Head Room |
Front 40.9 in
Rear 38.1 in |
Front 39.2 - 39.7 in
Rear 38.4 - 39.3 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Passengers in the back seat may find themselves a little more cramped in the Chevrolet Blazer EV than the Mazda CX-90.
The Chevrolet Blazer EV will be popular with taller drivers and passengers in the front seat, due to its greater front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-90.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). The Chevrolet Blazer EV is somewhat more expensive than the Mazda CX-90.
Dimensions
The Chevrolet Blazer EV is about the same width as the Mazda CX-90.
The Chevrolet Blazer EV is slightly shorter than the Mazda CX-90, which may make it easier to park.
Performance
When it comes to horsepower, the Chevrolet Blazer EV has a lot less horsepower than the Mazda CX-90.
Powertrain
The Chevrolet Blazer EV has much lower torque than the Mazda CX-90, which generally means that it won't feel as fast or powerful.
Utility
The Chevrolet Blazer EV has less seating than the Mazda CX-90, making the Mazda CX-90 the better choice, if you need to chauffeur many passengers.
The Chevrolet Blazer EV has significantly less cargo capacity than the Mazda CX-90.