2024 Land Rover
|
2025 Mazda
|
|
| MPG - City | 20 MPG | 23 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 27 MPG | Info not available |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space | 50.5 ft3 | Info not available |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 246 hp | 280 - 340 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 3,968 lbs | 3,500 - 5,000 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 172.1 in | 200.8 in |
| Exterior Width | 78.6 in | 77.6 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 40.0 in
Rear 33.8 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.4 in |
| Head Room |
Front 38.9 in
Rear 38.3 in |
Front 39.6 - 39.7 in
Rear 38.4 - 39.3 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Passengers in the backseat will be able to stretch out a lot more in the Mazda CX-70 than in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, due to its greater head- and legroom.
The Mazda CX-70 will be a hit with tall drivers and their front seat passengers, since it has greater front head- and legroom than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque as you will with the Mazda CX-70, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is somewhat more expensive than the Mazda CX-70.
Dimensions
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a little wider than the Mazda CX-70, so getting in and out of the car in a crowded parking lot may be a little more of a squeeze.
If you go with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, you'll have a much easier time finding a large enough space to park than you will with the Mazda CX-70.
Handling
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the same turning radius as the Mazda CX-70, so they both maneuver the same in and out of tight spots.
Performance
In terms of towing capacity, the Mazda CX-70 is clearly the choice over the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque for pulling heavy loads.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a little less horsepower than the Mazda CX-70.
Powertrain
With its lower torque engine, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque doesn't do as good a job transmitting power to its wheels as the Mazda CX-70.
Utility
In terms of seating, you'll be able to fit about the same number of people in both the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and the Mazda CX-70.